Comparison
GTX 1650 SUPER vs RX 6400
The GTX 1650 SUPER is 29.8% faster than RX 6400 in synthetic benchmark and 12.7% more expensive on the retail market.
- RX 6400
- RX 6500 XT
- RX 6600
3DMark Performace
4702
+29.8%
3DMark Performace
3622
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to null
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to ShadowSeven
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
100WPower Consumption
53WEfficiency
47
Efficiency
68
+44.7%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2022
MSRP
159 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650 SUPER
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 590 | 4777 | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 580 | 4346 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6400
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 3869 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 3552 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | 3908 |
Is GTX 1650 SUPER better than RX 6400?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 SUPER offers a better deal than, Radeon RX 6400 by 17.6%.
When it comes to power efficiency, GTX 1650 SUPER falls behind with an efficiency score that is 47, lower than that of RX 6400 68. Consuming 53 watts, RX 6400 has 44.7% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption