Comparison
The GTX 1060 3GB is 8.9% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 57.7% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
3869
+8.9%
Video Memory
4 GB
+33.3%
Video Memory
3 GB
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
120WEfficiency
47
+46.9%
Efficiency
32
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2016
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
199 $
+33.6%
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, GeForce GTX 1060 3GB by 50.0%.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. GTX 1060 3GB's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1650 leads by 46.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.