Comparison
Value
22
+214.3%
Value
7
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
5792
+63.1%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2015
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
6 GB
+50.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
250WEfficiency
47
+104.3%
Efficiency
23
No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 63.1% in 3Dmark benchmark.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. GTX 980 Ti's efficiency score is 23 .So GTX 1650 leads by 104.3%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 214.3%.
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |