Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX 5500 XT
The RX 5500 XT is 36.7% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 10.4% less expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
4857
+36.7%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
130WEfficiency
47
+27.0%
Efficiency
37
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2019
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 5500 XT
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 4702 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 4367 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX 5500 XT?
GTX 1650 price to performance rating is lower than RX 5500 XT's. RX 5500 XT offers 50.0% better value fo money.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX 5500 XT's efficiency score is 37 .So GTX 1650 leads by 27.0%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.