Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX 5700 XT
The RX 5700 XT is 164.9% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 192.6% more expensive on the retail market.
- RX 5600 XT
- RX 5700
- RX 5700 XT
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
9410
+164.9%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
225WEfficiency
47
+11.9%
Efficiency
42
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2019
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
399 $
+167.8%
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 5700 XT
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 8739 | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 9129 | |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8781 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX 5700 XT?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX 5700 XT by 9.1%.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX 5700 XT's efficiency score is 42 .So GTX 1650 leads by 11.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.