Comparison
Value
22
Value
24
+9.1%
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
9410
+164.9%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2019
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
399 $
+167.8%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
225WEfficiency
47
+11.9%
Efficiency
42
No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 164.9% in 3Dmark benchmark.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX 5700 XT's efficiency score is 42 .So GTX 1650 leads by 11.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.
GTX 1650 price to performance rating is lower than RX 5700 XT's. RX 5700 XT offers 9.1% better value fo money.
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8781 |