Comparison

GTX 1650 vs RX 5700 XT

Retail Price

Better Value

Retail Price

Value

22

Value

24

arrow up+9.1%

3DMark Performace

3552

3DMark Performace

9410

arrow up

+164.9%

Release Date

2019

Release Date

2019

MSRP

149 $

MSRP

399 $

arrow down

+167.8%

Video Memory

4 GB

Video Memory

8 GB

arrow up

+100.0%

Power Consumption

75W

Power Consumption

225W

Efficiency

47

arrow up+11.9%

Efficiency

42

Is GTX 1650 better than RX 5700 XT?

No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 164.9% in 3Dmark benchmark.

The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX 5700 XT's efficiency score is 42 .So GTX 1650 leads by 11.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.

GTX 1650 price to performance rating is lower than RX 5700 XT's. RX 5700 XT offers 9.1% better value fo money.

AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650

NAME3DMARKPRICE
Radeon RX 6400 3622

Nvidia Equivalent to RX 5700 XT