Comparison
Value
22
+120.0%
Value
10
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
8330
+134.5%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2019
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
349 $
+134.2%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
180WEfficiency
47
+2.2%
Efficiency
46
No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX 5700. AMD Radeon RX 5700 outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 134.5% in 3Dmark benchmark.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX 5700's efficiency score is 46 .So GTX 1650 leads by 2.2%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX 5700 by 120.0%.
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3060 | 8739 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 7601 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8781 |