Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX 6400
The RX 6400 is 2.0% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 13.4% more expensive on the retail market.
- RX 6400
- RX 6500 XT
- RX 6600
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
3622
+2.0%
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to null
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to ShadowSeven
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
53WEfficiency
47
Efficiency
68
+44.7%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2022
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6400
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 3552 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 3869 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | 3908 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX 6400?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX 6400 by 14.3%.
When it comes to power efficiency, GTX 1650 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 47, lower than that of RX 6400 68. Consuming 53 watts, RX 6400 has 44.7% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption