Comparison
RX 6400 vs GTX 1650
The RX 6400 is 2.0% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 7.2% less expensive on the retail market.
- GTX 1650
- GTX 1650 SUPER
- GTX 1660
3DMark Performace
3622
+2.0%
3DMark Performace
3552
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
53WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
68
+44.7%
Efficiency
47
Release Date
2022
Release Date
2019
MSRP
$
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6400
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 3552 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 3869 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | 3908 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Is RX 6400 better than GTX 1650?
When considering value for money, RX 6400 offers a better deal than, GeForce GTX 1650 by 8.3%.
The RX 6400 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 53 watts and a 3DMark score of 3622. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 68. GTX 1650's efficiency score is 47 .So RX 6400 leads by 44.7%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.