Comparison
RX 6400 vs GTX 1660
The GTX 1660 is 50.6% faster than RX 6400 in synthetic benchmark and 127.5% more expensive on the retail market.
- GTX 1650 SUPER
- GTX 1660
- GTX 1660 SUPER
3DMark Performace
3622
3DMark Performace
5454
+50.6%
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to ShadowSeven
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to GameGangsta
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
6 GB
+50.0%
Power Consumption
53WPower Consumption
120WEfficiency
68
+51.1%
Efficiency
45
Release Date
2022
Release Date
2019
MSRP
$
MSRP
219 $
+Infinity%
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6400
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 3552 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 3869 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | 3908 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1660
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 4973 |
Is RX 6400 better than GTX 1660?
When considering value for money, RX 6400 offers a better deal than, GeForce GTX 1660 by 50.0%.
The RX 6400 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 53 watts and a 3DMark score of 3622. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 68. GTX 1660's efficiency score is 45 .So RX 6400 leads by 51.1%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.