Comparison
The RX 6600 XT is 173.3% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 230.5% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
9707
+173.3%
3DMark Performace
3552
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to GAMING BENCH
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to null
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
160WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
61
+29.8%
Efficiency
47
Release Date
2021
Release Date
2019
MSRP
379 $
+154.4%
MSRP
149 $
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3060 | 8739 | |
GeForce RTX 4060 | 10630 | |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 9129 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
RX 6600 XT price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650's. GTX 1650 offers 26.3% better value fo money.
The RX 6600 XT is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 160 watts and a 3DMark score of 9707. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 61. GTX 1650's efficiency score is 47 .So RX 6600 XT leads by 29.8%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.