Comparison
The RX 6700 XT is 260.6% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 347.2% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
12808
+260.6%
3DMark Performace
3552
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to Shadow Seven
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to null
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
12 GB
+200.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
230WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
56
+19.1%
Efficiency
47
Release Date
2021
Release Date
2019
MSRP
479 $
+221.5%
MSRP
149 $
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | 13462 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 11744 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 13663 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
RX 6700 XT price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650's. GTX 1650 offers 25.0% better value fo money.
The RX 6700 XT is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 230 watts and a 3DMark score of 12808. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 56. GTX 1650's efficiency score is 47 .So RX 6700 XT leads by 19.1%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.