Comparison
The RX Vega 64 is 56.7% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic benchmark and 124.8% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
7367
+56.7%
3DMark Performace
4702
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
295WPower Consumption
100WEfficiency
25
Efficiency
47
+88.0%
Release Date
2017
Release Date
2019
MSRP
499 $
+213.8%
MSRP
159 $
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 2060 | 7601 | |
GeForce GTX 1080 | 7570 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 6845 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 590 | 4777 | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
Radeon RX 580 | 4346 |
RX Vega 64 price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650 SUPER's. GTX 1650 SUPER offers 40.0% better value fo money.
When it comes to power efficiency, RX Vega 64 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 25, lower than that of GTX 1650 SUPER 47. Consuming 100 watts, GTX 1650 SUPER has 88.0% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption