Comparison
GTX 1650 SUPER vs RX Vega 64
The RX Vega 64 is 56.7% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic benchmark and 108.8% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
4702
3DMark Performace
7367
+56.7%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
100WPower Consumption
295WEfficiency
47
+88.0%
Efficiency
25
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
159 $
MSRP
499 $
+213.8%
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650 SUPER
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 590 | 4777 | |
| Radeon RX 580 | 4346 | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 64
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 7601 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 7570 | |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 6845 |
Is GTX 1650 SUPER better than RX Vega 64?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 SUPER offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 64 by 33.3%.
The GTX 1650 SUPER is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 100 watts and a 3DMark score of 4702. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 64's efficiency score is 25 .So GTX 1650 SUPER leads by 88.0%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.