Comparison

GTX 1650 vs RX Vega 64

Better Value

Retail Price

$159

amazon logo

Retail Price

$ 499

amazon logo

Value

22

arrow up+46.7%

Value

15

3DMark Performace

3552

3DMark Performace

7367

arrow up

+107.4%

Video Memory

4 GB

Video Memory

8 GB

arrow up

+100.0%

Power Consumption

75W

Power Consumption

295W

Efficiency

47

arrow up+88.0%

Efficiency

25

Release Date

2019

Release Date

2017

MSRP

149 $

MSRP

499 $

arrow down

+234.9%

Is GTX 1650 better than RX Vega 64?

No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 107.4% in 3Dmark benchmark.

The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 64's efficiency score is 25 .So GTX 1650 leads by 88.0%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.

When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 64 by 46.7%.

AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650

NAME3DMARKPRICE
Radeon RX 64003622

Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 64

NAME3DMARKPRICE
GeForce RTX 20607601
GeForce GTX 10807570
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti6845