Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX Vega 56
The RX Vega 56 is 90.8% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 369.1% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
6776
+90.8%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
210WEfficiency
47
+46.9%
Efficiency
32
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX Vega 56?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 140.0%.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1650 leads by 46.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.