Comparison
Value
22
+120.0%
Value
10
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
6776
+90.8%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
210WEfficiency
47
+46.9%
Efficiency
32
No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 90.8% in 3Dmark benchmark.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1650 leads by 46.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 120.0%.
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 |