Comparison

GTX 1650 vs RX Vega 56

Better Value

Retail Price

Retail Price

Value

22

arrow up+120.0%

Value

10

3DMark Performace

3552

3DMark Performace

6776

arrow up

+90.8%

Release Date

2019

Release Date

2017

MSRP

149 $

arrow down

+Infinity%

MSRP

$

Video Memory

4 GB

Video Memory

8 GB

arrow up

+100.0%

Power Consumption

75W

Power Consumption

210W

Efficiency

47

arrow up+46.9%

Efficiency

32

Is GTX 1650 better than RX Vega 56?

No, in terms of performance, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slower than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 outperformes Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 90.8% in 3Dmark benchmark.

The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1650 leads by 46.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.

When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 120.0%.

AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650

NAME3DMARKPRICE
Radeon RX 6400 3622

Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56