Comparison
GTX 1660 vs RX Vega 56
The RX Vega 56 is 24.2% faster than GTX 1660 in synthetic benchmark and 149.6% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
5454
3DMark Performace
6776
+24.2%
Video Memory
6 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+33.3%
Power Consumption
120WPower Consumption
210WEfficiency
45
+40.6%
Efficiency
32
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
219 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1660
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 4973 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
Is GTX 1660 better than RX Vega 56?
When considering value for money, GTX 1660 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 90.0%.
The GTX 1660 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 120 watts and a 3DMark score of 5454. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 45. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1660 leads by 40.6%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.