Comparison
GTX 1660 SUPER vs RX Vega 56
The RX Vega 56 is 11.5% faster than GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic benchmark and 251.3% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
6078
3DMark Performace
6776
+11.5%
Video Memory
6 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+33.3%
Power Consumption
125WPower Consumption
210WEfficiency
49
+53.1%
Efficiency
32
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
229 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1660 SUPER
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 6776 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
Is GTX 1660 SUPER better than RX Vega 56?
When considering value for money, GTX 1660 SUPER offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 210.0%.
The GTX 1660 SUPER is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 125 watts and a 3DMark score of 6078. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 49. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1660 SUPER leads by 53.1%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.