Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX 6900 XT
The RX 6900 XT is 480.5% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 912.8% more expensive on the retail market.
- RX 6800 XT
- RX 6900 XT
- RX 6950 XT
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
20621
+480.5%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
16 GB
+300.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
300WEfficiency
47
Efficiency
69
+46.8%
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2020
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
999 $
+570.5%
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6900 XT
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 21214 | |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 22706 | |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 19592 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX 6900 XT?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX 6900 XT by 71.4%.
When it comes to power efficiency, GTX 1650 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 47, lower than that of RX 6900 XT 69. Consuming 300 watts, RX 6900 XT has 46.8% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption