Comparison
The RX 6950 XT is 504.0% faster than RX 6400 in synthetic benchmark and 425.1% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
3622
3DMark Performace
21878
+504.0%
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to ShadowSeven
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to Ancient Gameplays
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
16 GB
+300.0%
Power Consumption
53WPower Consumption
335WEfficiency
68
+4.6%
Efficiency
65
Release Date
2022
Release Date
2022
MSRP
$
MSRP
1099 $
+Infinity%
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 1650 | 3552 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 3869 | |
GeForce GTX 970 | 3648 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 5070 | 21278 | |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 21214 | |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 19592 |
RX 6400 price to performance rating is lower than RX 6950 XT's. RX 6950 XT offers 15.8% better value fo money.
The RX 6400 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 53 watts and a 3DMark score of 3622. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 68. RX 6950 XT's efficiency score is 65 .So RX 6400 leads by 4.6%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.