Comparison
RX 6900 XT vs GTX 1650
The RX 6900 XT is 480.5% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 899.3% more expensive on the retail market.
- GTX 1650
- GTX 1650 SUPER
- GTX 1660
3DMark Performace
20621
+480.5%
3DMark Performace
3552
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to BENCHMARKS FOR GAMERS
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to null
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
16 GB
+300.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
300WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
69
+46.8%
Efficiency
47
Release Date
2020
Release Date
2019
MSRP
999 $
+570.5%
MSRP
149 $
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6900 XT
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 21214 | |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 22706 | |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 19592 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Is RX 6900 XT better than GTX 1650?
RX 6900 XT price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650's. GTX 1650 offers 71.4% better value fo money.
The RX 6900 XT is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 300 watts and a 3DMark score of 20621. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 69. GTX 1650's efficiency score is 47 .So RX 6900 XT leads by 46.8%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.