Comparison
RX 6900 XT vs GTX 1660
The RX 6900 XT is 278.1% faster than GTX 1660 in synthetic benchmark and 345.1% more expensive on the retail market.
- GTX 1650 SUPER
- GTX 1660
- GTX 1660 SUPER
3DMark Performace
20621
+278.1%
3DMark Performace
5454
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to BENCHMARKS FOR GAMERS
Gaming Performance
Big thanks to GameGangsta
Benchmark Timestamps:
Video Memory
16 GB
+166.7%
Video Memory
6 GB
Power Consumption
300WPower Consumption
120WEfficiency
69
+53.3%
Efficiency
45
Release Date
2020
Release Date
2019
MSRP
999 $
+356.2%
MSRP
219 $
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 6900 XT
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 21214 | |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 22706 | |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 19592 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1660
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 4973 |
Is RX 6900 XT better than GTX 1660?
RX 6900 XT price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1660's. GTX 1660 offers 14.3% better value fo money.
The RX 6900 XT is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 300 watts and a 3DMark score of 20621. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 69. GTX 1660's efficiency score is 45 .So RX 6900 XT leads by 53.3%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.