Comparison
RX Vega 56 vs GTX 1650
The RX Vega 56 is 90.8% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 369.1% more expensive on the retail market.
- GTX 1650
- GTX 1650 SUPER
- GTX 1660
3DMark Performace
6776
+90.8%
3DMark Performace
3552
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
210WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
32
Efficiency
47
+46.9%
Release Date
2017
Release Date
2019
MSRP
$
MSRP
149 $
+Infinity%
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Is RX Vega 56 better than GTX 1650?
RX Vega 56 price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650's. GTX 1650 offers 140.0% better value fo money.
When it comes to power efficiency, RX Vega 56 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 32, lower than that of GTX 1650 47. Consuming 75 watts, GTX 1650 has 46.9% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption