Comparison
The RX Vega 56 is 90.8% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 80.5% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
6776
+90.8%
3DMark Performace
3552
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
210WPower Consumption
75WEfficiency
32
Efficiency
47
+46.9%
Release Date
2017
Release Date
2019
MSRP
399 $
+167.8%
MSRP
149 $
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 | |
GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 |
NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
When considering value for money, RX Vega 56 offers a better deal than, GeForce GTX 1650 by 6.3%.
When it comes to power efficiency, RX Vega 56 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 32, lower than that of GTX 1650 47. Consuming 75 watts, GTX 1650 has 46.9% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption