Comparison
RX Vega 56 vs GTX 1650 SUPER
The RX Vega 56 is 44.1% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic benchmark and 214.9% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
6776
+44.1%
3DMark Performace
4702
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Video Memory
4 GB
Power Consumption
210WPower Consumption
100WEfficiency
32
Efficiency
47
+46.9%
Release Date
2017
Release Date
2019
MSRP
$
MSRP
159 $
+Infinity%
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650 SUPER
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 590 | 4777 | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 580 | 4346 |
Is RX Vega 56 better than GTX 1650 SUPER?
RX Vega 56 price to performance rating is lower than GTX 1650 SUPER's. GTX 1650 SUPER offers 110.0% better value fo money.
When it comes to power efficiency, RX Vega 56 falls behind with an efficiency score that is 32, lower than that of GTX 1650 SUPER 47. Consuming 100 watts, GTX 1650 SUPER has 46.9% better power consumption to performance ratio. The efficiency score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with power consumption