Comparison
GTX 1650 SUPER vs RX Vega 56
The RX Vega 56 is 44.1% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic benchmark and 214.9% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
4702
3DMark Performace
6776
+44.1%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
100WPower Consumption
210WEfficiency
47
+46.9%
Efficiency
32
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
159 $
+Infinity%
MSRP
$
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650 SUPER
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 590 | 4777 | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 4857 | |
| Radeon RX 580 | 4346 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 56
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 6205 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6078 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6373 |
Is GTX 1650 SUPER better than RX Vega 56?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 SUPER offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 56 by 110.0%.
The GTX 1650 SUPER is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 100 watts and a 3DMark score of 4702. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 56's efficiency score is 32 .So GTX 1650 SUPER leads by 46.9%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.