Comparison
GTX 1650 vs RX Vega 64
The RX Vega 64 is 107.4% faster than GTX 1650 in synthetic benchmark and 234.9% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
3552
3DMark Performace
7367
+107.4%
Video Memory
4 GB
Video Memory
8 GB
+100.0%
Power Consumption
75WPower Consumption
295WEfficiency
47
+88.0%
Efficiency
25
Release Date
2019
Release Date
2017
MSRP
149 $
MSRP
499 $
+234.9%
AMD Equivalent to GTX 1650
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6400 | 3622 |
Nvidia Equivalent to RX Vega 64
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 7601 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 7570 | |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 6845 |
Is GTX 1650 better than RX Vega 64?
When considering value for money, GTX 1650 offers a better deal than, Radeon RX Vega 64 by 60.0%.
The GTX 1650 is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 75 watts and a 3DMark score of 3552. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 47. RX Vega 64's efficiency score is 25 .So GTX 1650 leads by 88.0%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.