Comparison
RX 9060 XT 16GB vs A770
The RX 9060 XT 16GB is 21.2% faster than A770 in synthetic benchmark and 8.2% more expensive on the retail market.
3DMark Performace
16436
+21.2%
3DMark Performace
13563
Video Memory
16 GB
Video Memory
16 GB
Power Consumption
160WPower Consumption
225WEfficiency
103
Efficiency
60
+-41.7%
Release Date
2025
Release Date
2022
MSRP
349 $
+6.1%
MSRP
329 $
Nvidia Equivalent to RX 9060 XT 16GB
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| Arc B580 | 14657 | |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | 15796 | |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | 15950 |
Nvidia Equivalent to A770
| NAME | 3DMARK | PRICE |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5060 | 13632 | |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | 13462 | |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 13663 |
Is RX 9060 XT 16GB better than A770?
When considering value for money, RX 9060 XT 16GB offers a better deal than, Arc A770 by 12.5%.
The RX 9060 XT 16GB is more energy-efficient considering its performance, having power consumption of 160 watts and a 3DMark score of 16436. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 103. A770's efficiency score is 60 .So RX 9060 XT 16GB leads by 71.7%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power consumption.